A poll taken of Long Island Catholics and reported in Newsday has a finding that has become customary in media discussions.
While 88 percent of Catholic respondents regard religion as “very important” or “fairly important” in their lives, they aren’t that happy with Church doctrine.
Nearly 90 percent disagreed with the Church on birth control, stating that contraception should be allowed.
More than three-quarters of them think women should be allowed to be priests. Most of them (80+ percent) think annulments should be easier.
The numbers prompted the director of the Siena College Research Institute, who conducted the poll, to summarize the ordinary Catholic response:
New Yorkers are saying, ‘Come on, this is New York, we are in the 21st century. These are things the church should do.’
Perhaps he renders their thinking correctly. But we should hold off from assuming that the Catholic leadership should respond accordingly.
We shouldn’t regard each tension and discrepancy between what the laity and the clergy believe as an error to be corrected. If people walk into church and receive a 100 percent endorsement of what they already think and feel, then why bother going?
The presence of God in the Mass must entail some form of challenge, an experience that carries people beyond the world and above what they are encouraged to think all week long in the hustle of daily life.
It is no insult to the flock to say that secular conditions should be managed critically and sometimes resisted, even if people have absorbed them and want the church to adapt. The Newsday story opens by noting that Catholics “see outdated doctrine as the greatest obstacle facing the local church,” but the Church should always expect itself to be outdated. It should also expect parishioners to bring contemporary and contrary viewpoints with them when they enter the nave. It is the duty of the clergy to stand for something else.
When this tension between the modernizing temper of the laity and the principled conservatism of the clergy disappears—that is one sign of a church in need of reform.
Mark Bauerlein is senior editor of First Things.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
