Kant’s appeal in “What Is Enlightenment?” is not primarily intellectual but ethical. Enlightenment, Kant says, “is man’s emergence from his self-incurred immaturity.” Immaturity he defines as “the inability to use one’s own understanding without the guidance of another,” and this immaturity is “self-incurred” when the cause is “lack of resolution and courage” to use one’s understanding without guidance from outside authority. “Laziness and cowardice” are the two chief impediments to enlightenment, particularly laziness, since it is so easy to be immature and simply pay for someone to make decisions for us.
Famously, he quotes from Horace. But the “sapere aude” does not mean “be wise” but “dare to be wise,” and Kant’s emphasis is on the daring as much as the wisdom.
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…