The Break

Modernism was not simply a secularizing movement in art. As Richard Harries shows in his recent The Image of Christ in Modern Art , Christ and Christian themes remained important for visual artists during from the period before World War I to the present. His richly illustrated book focuses on European artists of the period, but his chosen examples illustrate how modernist techniques were put to Christian uses.

All of these painters and sculptors worked against the background of what David Jones called “The Break”:

“By this he meant two things: First, the dominant cultural and religious ideology that had unified Europe for more than 1,000 years no longer existed. All that was left were fragmentary individual visions. Secondly, the world was now dominated by technology, so that the arts seemed to be marginalised. They are of no obvious use in such a society, and their previous role as signs no longer has any widespread public resonance. Their work was ‘idiosyncratic and personal in expression and experimental in technique, intimate and private rather than public and corporate.’” Jones summed up the situation with an analogy to the early church: “‘The priest and the artist are already in the catacombs, but separate catacombs, for the tecnician divides to rule” (5).

Roger Wagner captured the double challenge the “break” posed to artists. The first was a problem of style, of “how to bring freshness to subjects that have been treated so often they feel used up.” This was not a new problem, but “whereas artists in the past inherited a broadly uniform language that was at any rate a starting point, contemporary artists faced with an overwhelming plurality are compelled to choose a language of their own, and, in choosing, to exclude a part of their potential audience.” They have no choice but to select “a private language” from the “Babel” of competing styles.Alongside the stylistic problem is one of audience and venue: “In an art world where novelty and shock value are highly prized, work expressive of any kind of religious commitment is unlikely to find a ready welcome” (6).

Harries’s book is an introduction to artists who persisted in Christian themes after “The Break.”

Dear Reader,

Can I be direct with you?

War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.

First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.

But we can’t do it without readers like you.

Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.


Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.

Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.

GIVE NOW

If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Church in the Age of Therapy

Matthew Loftus

In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…

Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot

Anna Farrow

On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…

The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen

Mike Aquilina

Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…