Well, it’s that time of year again, the paper-grading season. I thought I’d share a particularly amusing/appalling incident with one of my students, as captured in this email of mine:
Dear Barry,
As I explained in the last email, the problems with your paper are not merely superficial, and not a result of your “computer problems,” or your “misunderstanding certain style-book and citation rules” and “have[sic] to adjust to a different set of expectations.” They are fundamental. The main arguments do not work. Many sentences are so plagued with errors that they are incoherent.
Just as in economics, there are rules to grammar, and you are responsible for knowing them.
In my note on the first page, which you say you cannot read due my “poor hand-writing” (tip: be more diplomatic with your professors!) I explain that your introduction promises to deliver an argument that it never does, and one which the few facts you do present openly contradict.
Sorry to have to underline the obvious, Barry, but the grade is an “F.” Due to rampant grade-inflation across our system, I only give out a handful of those each semester. In other words, your paper is really, really bad. It is a total failure.
I say this to you because you seem to remain oblivious. You say, “I’m going to have to, obviously, remarket and rebrand, and that will be challenging in this academic environment.”
Barry, this is not Marketing 101, but Composition 101, and I know your business professor would find your application of marketing terminology to this case incorrect. You cannot “rebrand” horrible writing. Nor can you revise it, even if you wanted. Whoever has taught you to talk this way has done you a great disservice.
Yes, my syllabus allows you to revise one paper, but I will not allow you to do it with this one.
Sincerely,
Professor Scott
P.S. I do notice that “challenging in this academic environment,” is a dig at my grading fairness. I do not appreciate that sort of insulting behavior, and if it continues I will contact the honor committee.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
