Postmodern sensibility has been described as the priority of image over reality, surface over depth, style over content, signifier over signified. The immediate Christian instinct is to turn those upside down – we are for reality and depth and content.
That’s a superficial response. The more fundamental, the more Trinitarian, response, the real subversion of postmodern subversion, is to undo the opposition. Just as the Father is never without His Son, and (so Athanasius) cannot be Father at all without His Son, so there is no reality without some imaging-forth of reality, no depth that does not play on the surface, no content that is style-less, no signified that is not accessible through signifiers.
Letters
Joshua T. Katz’s (“Pure Episcopalianism,” May 2025) reason for a theologically conservative person joining a theologically liberal…
The Revival of Patristics
On May 25, 1990, the renowned patristics scholar Charles Kannengiesser, S.J., delivered a lecture at the annual…
The Enduring Legacy of the Spanish Mystics
Last autumn, I spent a few days at my family’s coastal country house in northwestern Spain. The…