Structural features of Matthew 27

A few structural features of the crucifixion narrative in Matthew 27.

First, there are a couple of fairly clear small chiasms.  The scene of mockery in the Praetorium is a neat chiasm:

A. Soldiers gather and strip Jesus, vv 27-28a

B. Robe on Jesus, v 28b

C. Crown of thorns on Jesus’ head, v 29a

D. Reed in hand, v 29b

E. Soldiers kneel, v 29c

F. “Hail, King of the Jews,” v. 29d

E’. Soldiers spit, v. 30a

D’. Reed, v 30b

C’. Beat Jesus’ head, v 30c

B’. Strip robe, v 31a

A’. Replace Jesus’ garments, v 31b

The A-B sequences could be seen not as chiastic but as parallel: The scene begins with a stripping and an investiture, and it ends with a stripping and an investiture.

Verses 38-44 also form a fairly neat chiasm:

A. Robbers on Jesus’ right and left, v. 38

B. Passers-by mock Jesus, vv 39-40

1. Passers by

2. Destroy temple

3. If you are Son, come down

B’. Chief priests and elders mock, vv 41-43

1. Chief priests and elders

2. He saved others, cannot save Himself

3. He said He is Son of God

A’. Robbers insult Jesus, v 44

Overlapping and overarching these chiasms is a roughly parallel pattern:

A. Jesus offered drink, v 34

B. “You who destroy the temple,” v 40

C. “If you are son of God,” vv 40, 43

D. Robbers insult him, v. 44

A’. Jesus drinks, v 48

B’. Temple veil torn, v 51

C. “Truly this was the Son of God,” v 54

D’. Women minister to Him, vv 55-56

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Possibility of Possibility

Midge Goldberg

"Might could” is a Southern expression meaning “maybe I could” or “I might be able to,” conveying…

The False Promise of No Contact

Noelle Mering

Around the time nineteen-year-old Alice began cutting ties with her family, she announced on social media that…

Moral Certitude and the Iran War

Steven A. Long

The current military engagement with Iran calls renewed attention to just war theory in the Catholic tradition.…