A few structural features of the crucifixion narrative in Matthew 27.
First, there are a couple of fairly clear small chiasms. The scene of mockery in the Praetorium is a neat chiasm:
A. Soldiers gather and strip Jesus, vv 27-28a
B. Robe on Jesus, v 28b
C. Crown of thorns on Jesus’ head, v 29a
D. Reed in hand, v 29b
E. Soldiers kneel, v 29c
F. “Hail, King of the Jews,” v. 29d
E’. Soldiers spit, v. 30a
D’. Reed, v 30b
C’. Beat Jesus’ head, v 30c
B’. Strip robe, v 31a
A’. Replace Jesus’ garments, v 31b
The A-B sequences could be seen not as chiastic but as parallel: The scene begins with a stripping and an investiture, and it ends with a stripping and an investiture.
Verses 38-44 also form a fairly neat chiasm:
A. Robbers on Jesus’ right and left, v. 38
B. Passers-by mock Jesus, vv 39-40
1. Passers by
2. Destroy temple
3. If you are Son, come down
B’. Chief priests and elders mock, vv 41-43
1. Chief priests and elders
2. He saved others, cannot save Himself
3. He said He is Son of God
A’. Robbers insult Jesus, v 44
Overlapping and overarching these chiasms is a roughly parallel pattern:
A. Jesus offered drink, v 34
B. “You who destroy the temple,” v 40
C. “If you are son of God,” vv 40, 43
D. Robbers insult him, v. 44
A’. Jesus drinks, v 48
B’. Temple veil torn, v 51
C. “Truly this was the Son of God,” v 54
D’. Women minister to Him, vv 55-56
Moral Certitude and the Iran War
The current military engagement with Iran calls renewed attention to just war theory in the Catholic tradition.…
The Slow Death of England: New and Notable Books
The fate of England is much in the news as popular resistance to mass immigration grows, limits…
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…