Catherine Pickstock argues that Socrates does not articulate a “metaphysical” view of self-presence or interiority. She focuses on the erotic character of knowledge in the Phaedrus, which she points out, radically undermines the interior/exterior boundary. Knowledge on this view always involves ecstasy, an attraction to an object outside, and the subject is constituted by this ecstasy. The subject is thus not a sealed-off interiority but is always opening out to what is exterior to it. The gaze that Socrates defends is not the totalizing gaze of modernity; Socrates believes that the particulars cannot be encompassed, since they are by participation in the Good. The Socratic gaze is not mastering, but reverential.
Whether this is true to Socrates I do not presume to decide. But it certainly appears to be true .
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Moral Certitude and the Iran War
The current military engagement with Iran calls renewed attention to just war theory in the Catholic tradition.…
The Slow Death of England: New and Notable Books
The fate of England is much in the news as popular resistance to mass immigration grows, limits…
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…
