The atonement doesn’t take place “above the heads” of the participants – Jews, disciples, Pilate, Jesus – but in and through their concrete actions and reactions. There can be no sociology of atonement unless the atonement is understood as an inherently social and political event.
On the other hand, modern alternatives to satisfaction theory are efforts to formulate a “merely social” understanding of atonement. They work on this premise: If we leave God out of the event of the cross, how does Jesus’ death have a saving effect? “Moral influence” and “governmental” theories are, or at least can be, merely social atonement theories.
The deepest flaw of such theories is their secular assumption that there can be such a thing as a “merely social” event.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Moral Certitude and the Iran War
The current military engagement with Iran calls renewed attention to just war theory in the Catholic tradition.…
The Slow Death of England: New and Notable Books
The fate of England is much in the news as popular resistance to mass immigration grows, limits…
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…
