“There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe that government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. That that’s an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what . . .
“Our message of low taxes doesn’t connect . . . so my job is not to worry about those people. I’ll never convince them that they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives. What I have to do is convince the five to 10 percent in the center that are independents, that are thoughtful . . . .”
Someone might say it’s unfair this got out, just like it was unfair for the Duchess of Cambridge to have been photographed topless from a half mile away.
Was Romney playing to the rich guys by saying that almost half of Americans lack personal responsibility and so forth? Was he letting them that think they’re the victims here, because they pay lots of taxes and so many Americans pay nothing at all?
But lots of personally struggling guys (in, for example, my failed southern milltown of Lindale, GA) pay no taxes but are still voting for Mitt for a variety of reasons, most of them good.
I have to admit I don’t see that much evidence that America has become a providential soft despotism for almost half of our people. Lots of people who pay no income tax are knocking themselves out to be personally responsible. Life for the merely middle-class guy, many studies show, is tougher in some ways and more “contingent” than ever. Safety nets are imploding. Etc., etc.
Not only that, I’m all for middle-class Americans with lots of kids paying no income tax. They’re making their increasingly countercultural contribution.
This is, at least, the Romney equivalent of the Obama comment about the same folks desperately clinging to their God and guns.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
