Von Balthasar puts the nature/grace distinction in simple terms, and ones that resonate with certain strains of Reformed theology: “It belongs to the very essence of the creature that it must indeed be creature, but not a creature who has been exalted to a new order of grace: by nature a creature is the ‘servant’ but not the ‘friend’ of God.”
This is ambiguous: are we talking about “creatures” in general or about the specific creature that was Adam? What are we denying when we deny that man is not “by nature” a friend? Does that mean he’s not created a friend of God, or that friendship with God isn’t inherent in his “nature,” whatever that might be?
In any case, while we might be able to imagine a human being created purely as “servant,” that’s not how Adam was created. Adam was created as “son” (Luke 3:38).
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Moral Certitude and the Iran War
The current military engagement with Iran calls renewed attention to just war theory in the Catholic tradition.…
The Slow Death of England: New and Notable Books
The fate of England is much in the news as popular resistance to mass immigration grows, limits…
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…
