In the first part of his article “Soul of Reciprocity,” Milbank contrasts Cartesian generosity with Christian: “if the cogito is the donum , it is an impoverished donum . Generosity, in Descartes, begins as generosity towards oneself, or rather, as an expansive willing, that already is, auto-effectively, generosity. It is just this Cartesian generosity, which, we have seen, Marion re-works as a pure self-instigating will that must affirm the reality of the gift, and itself as cogiven. If such generosity is, in a second instance, sacrificial, then it is important to realise that a pure self-sacrifice unto utter loss must always dialectically presuppose a prior self-possession altogether outside gift, which may then be subsequently offered.”
Christian sacrifice recognizes no such pre-donated self: Descartes’ idea is “unlike evangelical ecstasy where one originally loses one’s life to gain it, and therefore, there is no self before gift and sacrifice, and yet, just for that reason, there is an original supplemented self that is a return of self to self in the very outgoing.”
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…
How the State Failed Noelia Castillo
On March 26, Noelia Castillo, a twenty-five-year-old Spanish woman, was killed by her doctors at her own…
The Mind’s Profane and Sacred Loves
The teachers you have make all the difference in your life. That they happened to come into…