Sacrificium non maleficium

How could Christ’s death be a sacrifice, since “those men who slew Christ did not perform any sacred act but rather wrought a great wrong”? ( ST , III, 48, 3). Christ’s passion is no sacrificium but a maleficium .

Thomas answers by stressing the voluntary character of Christ’s death. Augustine said that “Christ offered Himself up for us in the Passion,” and Thomas adds that “this voluntary enduring of the Passion was most acceptable to God, as coming from charity.” For the killers, Christ’s death was indeed maleficium . But the cross was not primarily an execution. Most fundamentally, it was Christ’s own act, done out of eternal love: “Hence it is Christ who is said to have offered this sacrifice, and not the executioners.”

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Letters

Joshua T. Katz’s (“Pure Episcopalianism,” May 2025) reason for a theologically conservative person joining a theologically liberal…

The Revival of Patristics

Stephen O. Presley

On May 25, 1990, the renowned patristics scholar Charles Kannengiesser, S.J., delivered a lecture at the annual…

The Enduring Legacy of the Spanish Mystics

Itxu Díaz

Last autumn, I spent a few days at my family’s coastal country house in northwestern Spain. The…