The big news is that Mitt was wonderfully prepared, full of specifics, eloquent in a plainspoken way, and struck exactly the right confidently yet calmly aggressive tone. Many Americans might have said, for the first time: You know, that guy would be a really good president. He certainly seemed to know the issues better than the president.
Obama, the bigger news is, was almost incredibly weak: Inarticulate, didn’t play the Bain or 47% cards, and pretty much seemed distracted and ticked off that someone would talk to him like that—nobody had talked to him like that for four years. Seemed like he really does need the teleprompter to speak in clear paragraphs. Even his final statement was flat and empty.
Romney was weakest on ObamaCare, but Obama didn’t exploit the RomneyCare similarity with any effectiveness.
Romney could easily have been better but was still good on entitlements, the Declaration/Constitution, and the point of cutting tax rates. He still needs to be schooled by Pete, but he was reliably impressive in his own way. The job creation thing worked for him, because he finally had pithy explanations.
Obama didn’t have the guts even to try to answer Romney on wasting $90 billion on Green Energy “losers.”
Obvious spin: Romney much better than his campaign. Obama much worse.
Another possible spin: Romney was shrewd to save his best for the campaign’s last month.
All we pomocons apologize, of course, for misunderestimating Mitt. I exempt Mr. Ceaser here, of course.
Downer point being pushed by CNN: The electoral college challenge remains between daunting and hopeless for Romney.
Encouraging news: This is the first actual victory for a Republican candidate in a debate since Reagan over Carter in 1980.
Best joke so far—from Dennis Miller: Obama better hope his kicked ass is covered under ObamaCare.
Telling comment from focus group: Up until tonight, the Obama campaign defined Romney. Tonight, Romney defined himself.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…