When the young Yves Congar visited Lutheran theologians and pastors in Germany in 1930, he learned that Lutheran perceptions of Catholicism were largely shaped by Dostoevsky’s Grand Inquisitor, of which Congar had never heard.
Today, it would be impossible for a sophisticated theologian like Congar to reach his mid-20s without at least having heard of Ivan Karamzov’s “poem.” But in 1930, the text had not yet become universal.
It is certain that many contemporary texts that seem to be permanent touchstones for all future discussion will not be viewed as the crucial texts of our day by later generations. What contemporary texts will become the “common sense” of later generations is impossible to guess. Texts, like seeds, must go into the ground and die before they bear fruit. And resurrections are in the nature of the case unpredictable.
The Revival of Patristics
On May 25, 1990, the renowned patristics scholar Charles Kannengiesser, S.J., delivered a lecture at the annual…
The Enduring Legacy of the Spanish Mystics
Last autumn, I spent a few days at my family’s coastal country house in northwestern Spain. The…
The trouble with blogging …
The trouble with blogging, RJN, is narrative structure. Or maybe voice. Or maybe diction. Or maybe syntax.…