FMG: Response to Robert Miller

Robert, you quote in your First Things post today a line from Hassan Nasrallah that epitomizes the mysterious and frustrating thing about dealing with this culture. He’s being blankly honest. They aren’t expecting to win, militarily; they are fighting to achieve “honor” and fighting against “humiliation.”

These are not terms that make sense in America; we think being honorable means being fair, honest, just, even gentle, in the sense that “gentleman” is supposed to evoke. But that is the effect of steeping the teabag of Christianity in 2,000 years of Euro-American hot water. Without the teachings of Jesus, honor means fighting to preserve “face.” It sets the tribal group at the besieged center of the universe and takes on all comers.

In the Middle East we’re up against something much more primitive in the human spirit than we are used to encountering. Understanding it won’t tell us any better how to cope with it, but at least we’ll see it more clearly.

And in that light, I’ll defend the pope’s appeal. Jesus was speaking to an oppressed minority, citizens of an occupied country, when he told them to love their enemies and turn the other cheek. This advice did not free his people from oppression, but then again, neither did open revolt forty years later. But it did allow his followers to live in his spirit, no matter what assailed them. The following centuries, when Christians were even more crushed and humiliated, were indeed the seed of the Church. Powerlessness can be power.

Today we Orthodox Christians observe the martyrdom of the Maccabees (honored, like other Old Testament figures, as saints who lived before Christ’s incarnation). In the morning Synaxarion, I read how the mother, Solomone, saw the torture and death of each of her seven sons¯or as it’s described, “her children’s triumph over the enemy.” Christianity is upside-down from the idea of “honor” we confront in this Hezbollah statement.

I think we can expect Christian leaders to do no less than issue the same call to unilateral love that Jesus gave¯nonsensical as it is if worldly power is the goal. We can expect that these few solitary Christian voices will not be heeded, anyway. But that’s no reason to dilute the strange and unsettling Christian message.

(Access contributors’ biographies by clicking here .)

Dear Reader,

Can I be direct with you?

War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.

First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.

But we can’t do it without readers like you.

Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.


Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.

Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.

GIVE NOW

If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Church in the Age of Therapy

Matthew Loftus

In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…

Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot

Anna Farrow

On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…

The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen

Mike Aquilina

Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…