Critiquing Schleiermacher’s hermeneutics, Gadamer ( Truth and Method (Continuum Impacts) , pp. 166-7) says that his effort to reconstruct the setting of the original work in order to divine the creative act of the creator is impossible: “We may ask whether what we obtain [from reconstructing the conditions of a work] is the meaning of the work of art that we are looking for, and whether it is corect to see understanding as a second creation, the reproduction of the originla production.”
He thinks not: “Reconstructing the original circumstances, like all restoration, is a futile undertaking in view of the historicity of our being.” We have moved on, and we cannot move back. What we get instead is “not the original,” but a reproduction. But that’s what we get anyway, whether we try to reconstruct the original setting or not. Reproduction is what all interpretation ends up with, and Gadamer insists that this is not a problem to be overcome but simply the nature of historical, temporal existence.
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…