Schmemann anticipates Milbank: “Secularism – we must again and again stresss this – is a ‘stepchild’ of Christianity, as are, in the last analysis, all secular ideologies which today dominate the world – not, as it is claimed by the Western apostles of a Christian acceptance of secularism, a legitimate child, but a heresy .”
And channels de Lubac: “It is indeed much easier to live and to breathe within neat distinctions between the sacred and the profane, the natural and the supernatural, the pure and the impure, to understand religion in terms of sacred ‘taboos,’ legal prescriptions and obligations, of ritual rectitude and canonical ‘validity.’ It is much more difficult to realize that such a religion not only does not constitute any threat to ‘secularism,’ but on the contrary, is its paradoxical ally.”
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…
How the State Failed Noelia Castillo
On March 26, Noelia Castillo, a twenty-five-year-old Spanish woman, was killed by her doctors at her own…
The Mind’s Profane and Sacred Loves
The teachers you have make all the difference in your life. That they happened to come into…