The Puritans were not prudes, but the caricature has some basis in fact. Again the Song of Songs provides a neat barometer. Scheper juxtaposes a medieval monk’s interpretation of the “breasts” of the Song with that of two Protestant interpreters. The results are fascinating:
“the Cistercian monk Gilbert of Hoilandia does in explicating the praise of the bride’s breasts: ‘Those breasts are beautiful which rise up a little and swell moderately, neither too elevated, nor, indeed, level with the rest of the chest. They are as if repressed but not depressed, softly restrained, but not flapping loosely.’ In contrast, the Protestant Durham says that ‘our Carnalness makes it hazardous and unsafe, to descend in the Explication of these Similitudes,’ and the Puritan Collinges says that ‘the very uncouthness of the same expressions, is an argument, that it is no meer Woman here intended.”
This yields the interesting hermeneutical conclusion that, at times, Protestants were more allegorical than medieval Catholics.
The Dreadful Christ of Pär Lagerkvist
It’s dangerous to meet a god,” says the disgraced Pythia in Pär Lagerkvist’s The Sibyl. Her observation…
The Possibility of Possibility
"Might could” is a Southern expression meaning “maybe I could” or “I might be able to,” conveying…
The False Promise of No Contact
Around the time nineteen-year-old Alice began cutting ties with her family, she announced on social media that…