From Neill and Wright again, summarizing the assumptions behind William Hietmuller’s early twentieth-century work on Paul’s views on sacraments. Hietmuller placed Paul within the history of religions, and arrived at conclusions that have guided many Pauline scholars ever since.
As summarized by Neill and Wright, there are four principles at work: a) There is radical difference between preaching of Jesus and the theology of Paul; b) Paul is self-contradictory, and unaware of it; c) The source of the contradiction is the intrusion of alien Hellenistic elements into his thought: destroyed faith as simple trust; d) This is the beginning of “Catholicism,” reliance on outward and visible, an institutionalization of Christianity that is at war with the true spiritual gospel of Protestantism.
The last is crucial: Critical scholarship sees itself as a continuation of the Reformation. Critical scholarship is a Pietist/Anabaptist movement that attempts to purge “foreign” and “catholic” residue from Christianity and re-tells the story of early Christianity accordingly.
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…
How the State Failed Noelia Castillo
On March 26, Noelia Castillo, a twenty-five-year-old Spanish woman, was killed by her doctors at her own…
The Mind’s Profane and Sacred Loves
The teachers you have make all the difference in your life. That they happened to come into…