Josh Marshall writes:
But a huge amount of the current gun debate, the argument for the gun-owning tribe, amounts to the gun culture invading my area, my culture, my part of the country.
That is where I think that Marshall goes wrong in his whole essay. No part of the country belongs to his “tribe” any more that it does to the “gun owning tribe.” I’m no more part of the gun culture than Marshall (I think), but the Supreme Court has ruled gun ownership (subject to numerous restrictions both potential and actual), a constitutional right. For the whole country. People owning and carrying guns (subject to the rules of a given jurisdiction) are no more “invading” his part of the country than would be people organizing a legal protest in favor of a political cause Marshall strenuously opposes. Marshall’s consciousness might be raised by attending a gun pride parade. Or maybe not, as Marshall writes:
But it captured a mentality that does seem pervasive among many more determined gun rights advocates — basically that us non-gun people need to be held down as it were and made to learn that it’s okay being around people carrying loaded weapons.
Actually attending a gun pride parade (or just watching one go by) might be an opportunity for Marshall to learn something. No, that something isn’t that “non-gun people need to be held down as it were.” The “as it were” does all the work since Marshall never wrote that anyone has suggested to touch a hair on his head. Marshall could learn that public spaces are not designed to suit only his particular preferences and, as a result, he will sometimes see things that that will make him uncomfortable. He could learn that his expectation that attitudes and actions that he finds unpleasant (though legal) cannot not be confined to only those regions of the country he chooses to avoid. He could learn that his comfort zone is not the extent of pluralism, and that his fellow citizens engaged in legal behavior do not need a license from him to engage in legal and peaceful behaviors in those public places Marshall mistakenly believes to be his own.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…