Oregon Assisted Suicide Not About Unbearable Suffering

When assisted suicide advocates try to sell the public on assisted suicide, they usually describe an eminently dying patient whose suffering cannot be palliated. But once it passes, we soon see that assisted suicide is used by people who have serious fears and concerns, but not untreatable pain.

This is certainly the pattern in Oregon. The Oregon state-published statistics are virtually useless as far as I am concerned, being primarily based on death doctor self reporting, many of whom have a close relationship with the assisted suicide advocacy group Compassion and Choices (formerly Hemlock Society), and the records are destroyed by the state so there can be no independent audit. But I think the reasons cited by patients for wanting a lethal prescription are probably accurate—particularly given the recent study—ignored by the media—that many patients receive assisted suicide while not experiencing significant symptoms. In any event, the AMA Medical News summarizes the reasons cited by patients in Oregon for wanting assisted suicide:

Why do patients use the law? Interviews done with prescribing physicians after patients died showed a variety of reasons for requesting physician-assisted suicide.
– 89.0% feared losing autonomy
– 86.6% were concerned about being less able to engage in enjoyable life activities
– 81.6% feared loss of dignity
– 58.2% feared loss of control of bodily functions
– 39.2% worried about becoming a burden on family, friends and caregivers
– 27.3% had inadequate pain control or had concerns about it
– 2.7% were concerned about financial implications of treatment

These are all important matters that deserve proper and compassionate interventions, not poison pills. But the idea that assisted suicide is about preventing agonizing death is just not true. It is about abandoning patients to serious fears and worries that can be—and often are—ameliorated with proper care.

Dear Reader,

Can I be direct with you?

War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.

First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.

But we can’t do it without readers like you.

Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.


Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.

Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.

GIVE NOW

If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Church in the Age of Therapy

Matthew Loftus

In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…

Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot

Anna Farrow

On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…

The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen

Mike Aquilina

Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…