This puzzles me: If a main point of Obamacare is to control costs—the real point is raw power, but never mind—then taxing medical devices that are so integral to the delivery of health care makes no sense. Yet, Obamacare imposes an excise tax on medical device manufacturers—just because it can, I suppose. From the story:
Safe sex is about to get more expensive, now that Congress has levied a new tax on condoms – and bedpans, bandages and thousands of other implements – to help pay for the just-enacted $940 billion health care overhaul. The change is courtesy of a 2.3 percent excise tax on medical devices that was embedded in the final version of the health care package and is expected to raise $20 billion over the next 10 years. The new tax – set to begin in 2013 – has spurred Medtronic Inc. of Minneapolis to warn of layoffs, and other medical device manufacturers to talk about slimming research and development budgets to offset higher costs. “It’s regrettable that the industry is facing this tax,” said Brett Loper, the senior executive vice president of government affairs for the Advanced Medical Technology Association, or AdvaMed. “It’s a tax that could hurt R&D.”
Some advocates of health care rationing argue that we should slow down medical advances achieved by such R&D because they are too expensive for society to absorb. I guess this is one way to do that. But bedpans? Bandages? Condoms?
The industry and some politicians are excusing this nonsense away by noting that it could have been worse:
Still, Loper acknowledged, the excise tax on medical devices could have been a whole lot higher. An original proposal advanced by Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., planned a 10-year tax bill of $40 billion on medical devices – an initiative that AdvaMed characterized as an “onerous” and punitive “tax on innovation.”
Don’t worry, if the current crowd remains in power, they’ll get around to raising the tax higher as Obamacare goes broke. I mean, the very idea that the currently imposed taxes are all they will want, is laughable.
This much is sure: The extra expense caused by the tax will be passed through to the consumer—meaning the insurance companies or us—which will raise costs overall, not lower them. Swell. As we effectively punish manufacturers for providing needed products, we are really just hurting ourselves. But this law makes no sense anyway, so why should the medical excise tax be any different?
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…