NHS Meltdown: Only the Rich to Receive Best Cancer Care

YouTube video

Yikes.  The former cancer head of the WHO has warned that soon, the best cancer treatments will be restricted to the rich. From the Telegraph story:

The most effective cancer treatments could become the “preserve of the rich” with the cost to the NHS rising towards £1 million per patient, a leading health care expert has claimed. Professor Karol Sikora said it was no longer viable to provide the best treatment to all patients free of charge, and that delivering new anti-cancer drugs would render the NHS penniless. Speaking at a pharmaceutical conference in London last week, the former head of cancer at the World Health Organisation said: “Over the next few years the best cancer care is probably going to become a preserve of the rich everywhere.”

See, that’s the problem right there. First, universal health care tries to cover everything, and for free.  Nice thought, but it can’t.

Rather, we should strive to protect all against catastrophic situations—like cancer treatment—and even then, never for free, even if it’s a $5 fee.  Sliding scale co-pays and deductibles should be part of any healthcare package—however funded.  People need to be responsible for the bulk of the costs of their own general health care—via employer provided insurance (middle class tax benefits!), health savings accounts, aided by point of access price competition, subsidized urgent care and community clinics, a competitive interstate private group and private insurance market, means tested voucher premium support, and subsidized high risk pools—which will help all of us be more responsible managing our own health care (and perhaps, health).  No government bureaucrats can do as well for us what we should be doing for ourselves.

I once supported single payer.  But I have become convinced it is the road to budget breakdown, invidiously-based rationing, long waits for care, reduced quality, significant loss of patient choice, and a collapse of funding accountability.  The NIH’s many travails vividly reveal the peril.

Dear Reader,

Can I be direct with you?

War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.

First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.

But we can’t do it without readers like you.

Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.


Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.

Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.

GIVE NOW

If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Church in the Age of Therapy

Matthew Loftus

In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…

Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot

Anna Farrow

On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…

The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen

Mike Aquilina

Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…