More on Isaiah 2:5

I argued in a post a few months ago that Isaiah 2:5 begins a new paragraph of Isaiah 2, rather than concluding the opening section of that chapter. I still think that’s correct, but it is something of a Janus verse that faces backwards too.

“Come” in 2:5, addressed to the “house of Jacob,” echoes the exhortation of the nations to “come” to Yahweh’s mountain (2:3). Further, the exhortation in 2:5 is to “walk,” again echoing the exhortation of 2:3, where the nations plan to walk in Yahweh’s paths.

Given those parallels between 2:3 and 2:5, the difference is highlighted. The nations plan to go to the mountain of Yahweh’s house, while the house of Jacob is called to walk in His “light.” Mountain and light – that should sound familiar, since Jesus conflates mountain-city and lamp in Matthew 5. Reading 2:3 and 2:5 together, we get a double picture: The city is a city of light; the city on the mountain is a lamp on a lampstand.

As such, it attracts and guides the nations, and when the city becomes a city of light for the nations, it is also the light of Yahweh for Israel. For the nations, it is a city of instruction, a place to find Yahweh’s torah. But Yahweh’s torah is a lamp to Israel’s feet and a light to her path. There is a provocation to jealousy implicit in the chapter. Because of her sins, Israel has become just another goy (1:4), but when she sees Yahweh welcoming the nations to Zion, she’ll want to get in the act: “Hurry up! Run to the light!”

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Church in the Age of Therapy

Matthew Loftus

In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…

Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot

Anna Farrow

On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…

The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen

Mike Aquilina

Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…