More Agenbites

I’ve gotten some early responses to my attempt to describe words that sound true of themselves , and I thought I’d pass them along. A linguistics professor at Swarthmore points out that Russian linguists have a term for these words, obrazopodrazhatel’no , which means, literally, “form-mimetic.” I think I’ll stick with my suggestion: agenbite .

Another writer observes that some, though not all, of this phenomenon is created by what linguists call a ” phonestheme .” Coined back in the 1930s by J.R. Firth, the term names the fact that, for unknown reasons, certain sounds are associated with a particular genus of objects or actions. So, for instance, the phonestheme “gl-” appears in a surprising number of words about light: glitter, glisten, glow, gleam, glare, glint, etc.

A reader, Mannie Sherberg, emails to note another phonestheme, with an initial “bl-” occurring in words about speech with a negative connotation: blab, blah-blah-blah, blandish, blankety-blank, blarney, blaspheme, blather, bleat, bleep, blither, blooper, bloviate, blowhard, blubber, bluff, blurt, bluster.

But Firth’s observation of phonesthemes is only part of what we mean by agenbites—a process by which some of them get formed, as we come to associate certain sounds with a particular genus, which helps those words sound true.

Meanwhile, readers have sent in or listed on their websites other words that seem to them agenbites. Maybe most interesting is Wendy V.’s suggestion of the category of anti -agenbites. I had said that words like perspicacious failed to be agenbites, but Wendy observes that pulchritude is more than a failure; it’s a full-blown anti-agenbite: a word that sounds false about itself.

My friend Fr. Edward Oakes, S.J. , emails: ” Frizzy sounds frizzy to me; frazzled too. And can’t you just hear the fizz in fizzy ?,” which suggests there’s a phonestheme in that z-sound, though the origin may be in the onomatopoeia of fizz . Another readers writes in with ” Phlegmatic —A word that tends to linger too long (if one is not careful) in the back of the throat.” In the teaser for a link to the article on Arts & Letters Daily , another friend, Denis Dutton, couldn’t resist adding his own example of puny .

Let’s see, what else? One blogger and his commenters suggest mucilage , piffle , ponnnnnnnnntificate , drone , bumptious , luscious , and juicy . Another adds nostrum , and yet another suggests the surname Bottum .

The formalist poets who meet on the website Eratosphere add weird , darken , luff , pluck , relinquish , runt , straddle , stun , tuft , and other possibilities.

Send in more, if ideas come to you.

Dear Reader,

Can I be direct with you?

War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.

First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.

But we can’t do it without readers like you.

Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.


Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.

Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.

GIVE NOW

If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Church in the Age of Therapy

Matthew Loftus

In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…

Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot

Anna Farrow

On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…

The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen

Mike Aquilina

Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…