Coursera woos me to MOOC through my college email. I haven’t succumbed yet, but only because they haven’t offered anything interesting enough. I signed up for one course on logic, but backed out after clarification over the goal of the course which was to prove through logic that God does not exist. Having been to college and teaching at a college, even just a community, I’ve been through that argument informally many times. God or not-God is a choice of premise, an unsettled enthymeme, by which I mean that for some the matter is settled through faith in God and for others it is settled by — I am told I cannot call it faith in science, so I don’t know what to term the unstated assumption of their logic, except God-is-not. Some atheists talk about God more than most believers do. Anyway, I wasn’t in the mood for the argument at the time, which is how I have resisted the siren call of the MOOC.
Peter Lawler’s current discussion of the economics of MOOCs is on the money. Save for this, that apparently students are reluctant to go for the credit offered by colleges for MOOC courses. James Ceaser insists on the preferability of books for the mass transmission of knowledge; there follows that post an argument about the need for teachers, which Jim incited with “True, a few of the BOOKs might produce courses that would prove a too difficult for students to pursue on their own.” That might be true, but might be more about giving a context to any original work. I am writing this as a confessed autodidact. Most of the books I was instructed to read in college I had already read. Through reason a reader might get the main point or instead get a main point which might not be the main point by conventional wisdom. There’s a lot to be said for conventional wisdom.
I might also argue that any tool that enables the spread of knowledge is worthwhile. My preference has been books, though the Internet and the graphical user interfaces that preceded it have been great sources for information that made the computer user in the hinterland feel like part of the modern conversation in a more immediate way. The MOOC might be a useful means for those merely interested in learning to be able to do so. And at far less expense than the college classroom, which we also deplore.
True, a few of the BOOKs might produce courses that would prove a too difficult for students to pursue on their own. – See more at: http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2013/07/08/a-better-mooc/#sthash.WJstcLgh.dpufTrue, a few of the BOOKs might produce courses that would prove a too difficult for students to pursue on their own.
True, a few of the BOOKs might produce courses that would prove a too difficult for students to pursue on their own. – See more at: http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2013/07/08/a-better-mooc/#sthash.WJstcLgh.dpuf
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
