Yesterday, in my post on Mike Huckabee and commutations, I wrote :
[T]he politically prudent tactic would have been to simply refuse to grant any leniency—ever. Other governors with their sights set on higher offices had learned that doing nothing—even to correct obvious instances of injustice—was unlikely to cause any long-term political damage. Keeping an innocent man in prison is less harmful to an ambitious politician than freeing someone who may commit other crimes.
Today, on the Laura Ingraham Show, Minnesota governor Tim Pawlenty admits that he follows the politically prudent tactic of simply refusing to grant any leniency—ever.
In Minnesota, I don’t think I’ve ever voted for clemency. We’ve given out pardons for things after everybody has served out their term, but again, usually for more minor offenses. But clemency, certainly not. Commutation of sentence, certainly not.
Now what Gov. Pawlenty probably meant is that the the criminal justice system in Minnesota is so perfect that clemency and commutation are never, ever needed because no one ever gets an unjust sentence, no relevant facts are ever provided after sentencing that should be considered, etc. The reason no clemency is granted, in other words, is because it is never needed to correct an injustice.
Surely that is what he is saying because otherwise it might appear that he is shirking his duties as governor and prejudging all cases before he ever examines them to see if an injustice needs to be rectified. I can’t imagine he would mean anything like, much less have the audacity to say it on a national radio program. To do so would suggest that he is merely a parody of a “law and order conservative” and has no comprehension of what justice requires.
The powers of clemency can be abused in two ways: by using the power too freely, as Gov. Huckabee appears to have done, or by refusing to consider movie downloads using them at all, as Gov. Pawlenty appears to do. Finding that balance is the reason we value prudence and judgement in our state executives. Perhaps somewhere in America there is a Republican governor who doesn’t suffer from either an excess of political compassion or of political cowardice. Maybe the GOP will find them before 2012.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…