Postmodern intellectuals believe they have seen through the arrogant or naive efforts of earlier generations of intellectuals. Now we see the folly of foundationalism, now we see that all knowledge is intertwined with regimes of power-knowledge, now we know that all thought arises from knotty aporias. We see that their meta-narratives of scientific progress were illusions, if not unConstitutional.
As Featherstone says, “the focus on the apparent naivete of the intellectuals of yesteryear, with their universalistic schemes, bring in a back doo sense of our own progress in knowledge over theirs with which to castigate their own false belief in progress.” And totalization is condemned from the perspective of a (totalizing) claim that contemporary culture is postmodern.
The Dreadful Christ of Pär Lagerkvist
It’s dangerous to meet a god,” says the disgraced Pythia in Pär Lagerkvist’s The Sibyl. Her observation…
The Possibility of Possibility
"Might could” is a Southern expression meaning “maybe I could” or “I might be able to,” conveying…
The False Promise of No Contact
Around the time nineteen-year-old Alice began cutting ties with her family, she announced on social media that…