A new PETA-sponsored “go vegan” campaign billboard in Newark, N.J., includes the phrase “Studies have shown a link between cow’s milk and autism.”
The animal rights group cites two studies by researchers at the University of Rome as reason for the purported “link,” even though the studies themselves do not prove any connection between milk and autism.
Dr. Susan McGrew, associate professor of pediatrics at Vanderbilt University, said the billboard looks more like a scare tactic rather than an evidence-based statement. “I’m concerned more about the people who don’t have autism,” McGrew said. “They will be scared that they’ll get autism if they drink milk.”
What? PETA not use evidence based research? I am tempted to sarcasm, but that should be reserved for PETA.
The autism societies aren’t amused either:
“We think the PETA ad campaign is inappropriate because it gives a misleading impression toward a cause or a treatment for autism,” said Marguerite Kirst Colston, spokeswoman for the Autism Society of America.
“This advertisement gives the impression that drinking milk causes autism, and that is not the case,” said Doreen Granpeesheh, executive director of Center for Autism and Related Disorders.
Granpeesheh said she understands PETA’s intentions of the possible benefits of the casein-free diet and pointing to milk, but she said the presentation is walking the line with how the information is perceived. “I think it’s really brave of PETA, but I don’t think you could say that there has been a link between cow’s milk and autism.”
Brave?! Good grief! (There I go again.)
Ms. Granpeesheh: PETA does not care about truth. Its intentions are not well meaning. It is pursuing an ideology and it doesn’t matter who or what gets in the way. One of the comments to the story said it well:
[H]e [PETA’s Bruce Friedrich] imagines that parents don’t see through his flip and cynical ploy, his shameful attempt to use our family members as unwilling and unwitting props in his petty little campaign against the dairy industry.
Yes. Cynical is a good word for it. So is shameful. Sigh. It still stuns me that so many people don’t know the truth about this subversive organization.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
