The Hebrew word for “marred” occurs in only two places in the Old Testament: It describes the Suffering Servant (Isaiah 52:14) and it is used to refer to disfigurements that disqualify a descendant of Aaron from being priest (Leviticus 22:25). The connection doesn’t seem fortuitous.
The fact that the Servant is “marred” helps to explain the reaction of the people to His appearance. He cannot be the Lord’s arm if he is disfigured like that. But then we’re told that the Servant not only offers an asham , a trespass offering (53:10), but we’re told that He offers His own marred self as the trespass offering. If a marred man is unable to be a priest, so too a married sacrifice is unable to be a suitable sacrifice.
Yet Yahweh responds favorably to the Servant’s self-offering, prolonging his days and exalting Him and giving Him spoils. If Yahweh accepts a marred offering by a marred offerer, that can only mean that there has been some seismic shift in the structures of worship and sacrifice. It means that in the Servant we have a priesthood and a sacrificial system different from the Mosaic system and the Aaronic priesthood.
The vindication of the Servant’s offering by His resurrection announces a new order of things. More than announce: It creates a new order of things.
Moral Certitude and the Iran War
The current military engagement with Iran calls renewed attention to just war theory in the Catholic tradition.…
The Slow Death of England: New and Notable Books
The fate of England is much in the news as popular resistance to mass immigration grows, limits…
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…