The structure of Mark 3:1-6 seems to be basically chiastic:
A. Jesus’ entry to synagogue
B. man with withered hand
C. heal on Sabbath?
D. Jesus to man
E. Jesus to Pharisees
F. Silence
E’. Jesus angry and grieved at Pharisees
D’. Jesus to man
C’. ??
B’. restored hand
A’. Pharisees consult with Herodians about how to destroy him
Two observations: First, the Pharisees’ silence seem to be central, the turning point of the story and one of a series of important turning points in the gospel. Jesus reacts to their silence with the beginnings of eschatological wrath and grief. Second, the fact that the text doesn’t return to the Sabbath issue is noteworthy. The Pharisees are very interested in learning whether Jesus will break the Sabbath, but by the end of the story their Sabbatarianism is just dropped, as they go out to plot a murder. As they forget the Sabbath, Mark leaves an open space in the story where we would expect another Sabbath reference.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…
How the State Failed Noelia Castillo
On March 26, Noelia Castillo, a twenty-five-year-old Spanish woman, was killed by her doctors at her own…
The Mind’s Profane and Sacred Loves
The teachers you have make all the difference in your life. That they happened to come into…
