MAD MEN Studies

. . . are being pursued in earnest by the distinguished LEAGUE OF ORDINARY GENTLEMEN—one of the best blogs around. There’s an empty open thread there. Please contribute.

The reason for hope we can have for the future of the series is that it might take a show or two to set up the new direction.

The new insatiable kinkiness of Don is that his new wife is very okay—well, much more than very okay—with having sex with Don and Dick Whitman (his real identity) simultaneously. So he’s all for isolating their virtual threesome from his so-called friends and colleagues, who, of course, can’t really know him. He now orbits above them in serene superiority—coming to work when he pleases, making cameo appearances in meetings to quickly and perfectly solve issues, and is so lost in new erotic life that he no longer has any advertising ambition. Not only that, his unencumbered new wife gets to come to work with him, and it’s not for nothing that they’re referred to enviously by their male co-workers as Mr. and Mrs. Masters and Johnson. To me, this is not a promising line of development.

Pete, we’re reminded over there at THE LEAGUE, is striving to become the most interesting character. His life is starting to develop the way Don’s did in the first season—wife, kids, advertisng ambition and prowess and such. He has a more normally desirable and hyper-supportive wife, which is nice but, of course, boring. And Pete himself remains pretty boring. Who cares about his feeling all entitled to a bigger office? Aren’t his more sophisticated and interesting colleagues still right to regard him with condescension? His character and ambition ain’t all that much. That’s been the point so far, at least. Can we quickly find out there’s a lot more to Pete than we thought? To me so far, this is also not that promising a line of development.

And then, as djf and others have noted, there’s the completely unimaginative and needlessly overbearing intrusion of the race issue, reminding us that it’s THE SIXTIES!

Dear Reader,

Can I be direct with you?

War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.

First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.

But we can’t do it without readers like you.

Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.


Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.

Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.

GIVE NOW

If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Church in the Age of Therapy

Matthew Loftus

In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…

Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot

Anna Farrow

On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…

The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen

Mike Aquilina

Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…