The variety and flexibility of Thomas’s terminology regarding Christ’s passion and sin is remarkable. In ST III, 49, 1, he asks whether Christ’s passion liberates from sin ( liberati a peccato ). Christ’s death brings freedom.
Then he shifts gears. Objection 2 says that “Christ’s Passion could not cleanse ( mundare ) us from sin.” In objection 4, he writes of “forgiveness” ( remissio ). At the end of the Respondeo , he concludes that Christ’s sufferings have divine power to “expel” sins ( expellendum peccatum ).
The terminological disconnect between the objection and response indicates that Thomas viewed these terms as virtually interchangeable. To an objection about “liberation” from sin, Thomas responds that Christ’s passion “expels” sin. To an objection about “cleansing,” Thomas responds with an argument about remissio . Objection 4 speaks of forgiveness, but the reply introduces a new concept, deletionem propriorum peccatorum .
Where Protestant theology generally distinguishes between forgiveness of the guilt of sin and liberation from the power of sin, Thomas smudges: Liberation is forgiveness is cleansing is expulsion is deletion. To be forgiven is, for Thomas, to be freed.
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…
How the State Failed Noelia Castillo
On March 26, Noelia Castillo, a twenty-five-year-old Spanish woman, was killed by her doctors at her own…
The Mind’s Profane and Sacred Loves
The teachers you have make all the difference in your life. That they happened to come into…