Liberated tyranny

Robert Jenson notes in his comments on the Song of Songs 8:1-2 that the lovers long for public recognition of their love.  The bride wants to be able to kiss her lover in the street like a brother.  Jensonn contrasts this to the contemporary claim that sex is a purely private matter between consenting adults.

For the Song, “however private the act of sexual union may indeed be, its existence and character is vital public information . . . . Where sexual union is conceived of as ‘private’ and so is legally unregulated and just so legally powerless, community can be held together only by arbitrary fiat and, if it comes to that, by force.  Sexual ‘liberation’ and political tyranny are but two sides of one coin.”

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Letters

Joshua T. Katz’s (“Pure Episcopalianism,” May 2025) reason for a theologically conservative person joining a theologically liberal…

The Revival of Patristics

Stephen O. Presley

On May 25, 1990, the renowned patristics scholar Charles Kannengiesser, S.J., delivered a lecture at the annual…

The Enduring Legacy of the Spanish Mystics

Itxu Díaz

Last autumn, I spent a few days at my family’s coastal country house in northwestern Spain. The…