Lear vs. Lear

There is a block in Brooklyn where it storms every day—twice
a day, on Sundays. It’s been storming since January, and it’ll last till
May—and then the storm will spread out all over New York. On one side of the
street, at the Brooklyn Academy of Music, Angus Jackson’s King Lear (starring Frank Langella) has just wrapped up. And across
the street, Arin Arbus’s King Lear (starring
Michael Pennington) opened in March.

It
won’t stop with them, either. There are five productions of the play in New
York this year. In May, Sam Mendes’ Lear,
starring Simon Russel Beale, will be broadcast into New York theaters. Then,
this summer, there’s Shakespeare in the Park. Then in September the Globe
Shakespeare Company will bring King Lear,
to the Skirball Center. At this rate, approximately three hundred eyes will be
gouged out and Cordelia will be hanged upwards of 150 times before this storm
is over.

It’s
tempting to ascribe some greater cultural meaning to this wave of Lears (second term presidency?
anti-Boomer rage?). But plays become trendy all the time—we’re recovering now
from a Macbeth outbreak, and about
two years ago Cymbeline was the hot
new thing. The timing of a production often has much more to do with the
mundane details of scheduling than it does with artistic vision, as I learned
after asking a bunch of bored theater people, “Why Lear, why now?”

Langella’s
Lear is the more imposing and tough of the two currently walking the stage. He’s
a “man who fought wars,” director Angus Jackson told me. “I’ve
seen other Lears which verge on Prospero . . . Our Lear shoots from the hip.” Langella gets physically violent with
Cordelia, throwing her to the floor. He menaces Regan while cursing her with bareness.
His frightening physicality almost makes his daughters’ wickedness sympathetic.

When Jackson’s Lear reaches the storm—where Lear, cast out by his daughters, rages
amongst the elements—it’s very realistic. It even rains on stage, and Langella
has to shout to be heard over the din. Nature doesn’t care if you’re a king.

For
the rest of the play, we see a diminished Lear—a humbled Lear, stripped of his
vanity, a man who believes he is a god realizing he is a man. This Lear does
not stay mad. But he also does not stay a king. The storm washes away
convention: He relinquishes command. When
he sees Cordelia again, he collapses into vulnerable, frail, begging
forgiveness. When he brings her body onstage, he’s completely broken. In short:
be humble, for you are weak and the world is wide. This is the “real world.”
Memento mori.

Across the street, we find a more philosophical king. When
I asked Michael Pennington about Lear, his first comparison is to the Duke in Measure for Measure, who also briefly
gives up his title, but (unlike Lear) successfully seizes it back. Accordingly,
his Lear was more regal and more stagey—less earthy than Langella, and more
calculating. When Cordelia defies him,
he doesn’t shove her and barely raises his voice. Yet his edict is just as
brutal. Accordingly, his storm takes a different form.
Instead of representing a force outside of Lear, it’s what he calls the “tempest
in my mind,” made manifest, equal parts blinding rage and startling clarity.

There is no rain. Drums provide the
thunder. Flashes of lightning include the houselights, so that the audience
itself is sometimes illuminated, before descending into blackness. The drumming
punctuates Lear’s words instead of overpowering them. He is not within the
storm; he drives it. We are watching an act of creation.

“There is some temperamental extreme, in
him, in the storm—something whooks him,” Pennington says, making a kind of
thwacking noise, “so that he’s like two sides of a diamond”—both hard and
brilliant. After the storm, his Lear becomes philosophical, going as
joyfully to prison at the end as Socrates goes to hemlock. After the storm, “He’s better, really,
but he improves too late.”

Although
he can be philosophic about his own death, he cannot be so light about his
daughter’s. When Pennington cries for her at the end, his howls are not the
cries of a diminished man—but of a man who had seen wisdom, and thought that he
was finally free of human suffering, only to be dragged back into the world. With
more time, he perhaps could have endured even this—but the disconnect between
what he knows and what he feels is too great. It is both beautiful and terrible.

The storm is the troubled
heart and center of King Lear. Turned out by his wicked
daughters, King Lear is abandoned on the heath in a violent storm at night, and
he rages at it—or with it, asking the weather to destroy the world. Somewhere
in this tempest, though, Lear realizes that he cannot smite the world—and by
the end of the storm, he doesn’t want to, even though he has cause. Man, he
says, is a “poor bare, forked animal.”

What
happens to him?

Pennington’s
answer is the better one—showing that the beginnings of wisdom are often as
fearsome as they are beautiful. The
clarity of thought evident in his performance is what separates a good performance,
like Langella’s, from a transcendent one.

Aside
from Lear’s mistakes and misdeeds in the opening scene the wrongs committed by
others in this play start out as reasonable. Regan and Goneril begin by
protesting (correctly) that Lear treats them badly. Edmund, too, has plenty of
rational arguments against superstition. After the storm, these reasonable
protestations become eye-gouging and murder. How will we know when our own
reason leads us astray?

Lear—who
before he goes out into the storm pleads with his daughters to “Reason not”—begins to turn toward something like kindness. His philosophical madness allows
him to make that mid-course correction—from wishing the destruction of all to
consciousness of the frailty of all. Even as the play becomes darker, some kind
of moral awakening takes place.

Watching
two great productions of Lear, almost
back-to-back, the truth of both productions comes home. The storm is and is not
there; it is both outside and inside. It is about nature’s ultimate superiority
over man and about the transcendent power of the mind. Lear is broken and not
broken by the end, made vulnerable and stronger by the storm. He is humbled and
ennobled, created and destroyed.

As directors, Jackson and Arbus have to pick one
aspect of Lear and play it up: the
Lear who shoots from the hip or the Lear who hardens into a diamond. But as
audience members, we get to see Lear from
one side and then from another, and appreciate how it all fits into one whole. Here’s to all the
storms to come.

Kate Havard is a journalist in New York City and a Tikvah fellow. Image from Theatre for a New Audience. 

Become a fan of First Things on Facebook, subscribe to First Things via RSS, and follow First Things on Twitter.