Language and reality

Does language take cues from reality? Tallis says Yes; at least, that’s one kind of relation language has to reality.

His charming evidence: He notes that it’s more common to add “barking” to “dog” than to add other verbs. If language doesn’t take its cues from reality, “we must surely be at a loss to explain why the transition from ‘dog’ to ‘-is barking’ has a high frequency in observed speech while those from ‘dog’ to ‘-is quacking’ or from ‘dog’ to ‘-is reading Of Grammatology with pleasure and profit’ have much lower, or even negligible, frequencies.”

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Revival of Patristics

Stephen O. Presley

On May 25, 1990, the renowned patristics scholar Charles Kannengiesser, S.J., delivered a lecture at the annual…

The Enduring Legacy of the Spanish Mystics

Itxu Díaz

Last autumn, I spent a few days at my family’s coastal country house in northwestern Spain. The…

The trouble with blogging …

Joseph Bottum

The trouble with blogging, RJN, is narrative structure. Or maybe voice. Or maybe diction. Or maybe syntax.…