Does language take cues from reality? Tallis says Yes; at least, that’s one kind of relation language has to reality.
His charming evidence: He notes that it’s more common to add “barking” to “dog” than to add other verbs. If language doesn’t take its cues from reality, “we must surely be at a loss to explain why the transition from ‘dog’ to ‘-is barking’ has a high frequency in observed speech while those from ‘dog’ to ‘-is quacking’ or from ‘dog’ to ‘-is reading Of Grammatology with pleasure and profit’ have much lower, or even negligible, frequencies.”
The Revival of Patristics
On May 25, 1990, the renowned patristics scholar Charles Kannengiesser, S.J., delivered a lecture at the annual…
The Enduring Legacy of the Spanish Mystics
Last autumn, I spent a few days at my family’s coastal country house in northwestern Spain. The…
The trouble with blogging …
The trouble with blogging, RJN, is narrative structure. Or maybe voice. Or maybe diction. Or maybe syntax.…