An old essay by Edd Winfield Parks explores the question of how Austen gets us to move on to the next chapter. She doesn’t, he points out, use cliff-hanger chapter endings, like a John Grisham novel. What keeps us reading? The question becomes more pointed when we notice that Austen often closes of a chapter with a summary statement, more often a description of the characters than a summary of the plot-thus-far.
Parks argues that Austen keeps us reading by leaving questions of character unanswered. The opening chapter of P&P describes Mr. and Mrs. Bennet’s character and mind; Mrs. Bennet’s is fixed, and remains so throughout the book. Mr. Bennet’s character, though is “unstable”: “The interest which she engenders is in following changes and revelations of character instead of changes in plot.”
Letters
Joshua T. Katz’s (“Pure Episcopalianism,” May 2025) reason for a theologically conservative person joining a theologically liberal…
The Revival of Patristics
On May 25, 1990, the renowned patristics scholar Charles Kannengiesser, S.J., delivered a lecture at the annual…
The Enduring Legacy of the Spanish Mystics
Last autumn, I spent a few days at my family’s coastal country house in northwestern Spain. The…