The Center for Bioethics and Culture’s award-winning documentary Eggsploitation has been making a very big splash because it explores the hitherto rarely discussed risks associated with egg donation. Now, a recent million dollar-plus verdict illustrates not only the potential perils of egg donation, but the potential civil legal consequences to egg procurers. From the story:
An Arlington jury has returned a $1.5 million verdict for a woman who alleged that she suffered a stroke because a physician was negligent in providing in vitro fertilization therapy. At the time of the stroke in November 2008, the plaintiff, Maimunah Jafer, was relatively young for IVF therapy at age 30. She also had a hormonal disorder and low body mass. Those factors put her at risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, according to her attorneys, Malcolm P. McConnell III and Jason W. Konvicka of Richmond.
Despite the indications that Jafer was at risk, McConnell said, Dr. Michael Nort DiMattina continued with the therapy, including the injection of a hormone to stimulate the ovaries to produce eggs so they could be taken from Jafer’s body and fertilized outside of it. The hormone caused Jafer’s ovaries to become enlarged and fluid to leak from blood vessels and collect in her abdomen. The loss of fluid thickened the viscosity of Jafer’s blood, which increased the risk of a stroke caused by a blood clot in the brain, and her physicians responded by injecting fluids into her bloodstream. Jafer initially lost most of the use of the left side of her body from the stroke, McConnell said. She has recovered somewhat but still walks with a limp and continues to have weakness and lack of dexterity in her left hand.
This situation involved a woman trying to have her own baby. Now, imagine the verdict if she had been paid to be hyper-ovulated for another couple or for a scientist wanting eggs for human cloning. The potential for such verdicts is very high—unless there is thorough and very full disclosure of the risks. And once that is given, many women will back out not wanting to risk their lives, health, and fertility. Indeed, cases like this are the kind that whet lawyers’ appetites.
At minimum, egg donation should be treated like cigarette smoking. As a very risky behavior best not engaged in. I can think of few better deterrents to the kind of wild, wild, west practices too often seen in the IVF industry than the potential for huge lawsuits. This case makes me think they may be coming.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…