It Begins (Maybe)

A new poll shows Santorum in third place in Iowa.  Sure it is just one poll,  but like Rich Lowry says, the strongest argument against Santorum for people who want to like him has been that he had no chance.  When he looks like he is doing better, people will give themselves permission to support him.  Maybe.  That jibes with what I read.  The most common knock on Santorum I’ve read from orthodox conservatives isn’t ”well sure, but he seems waaaay too hot to attack Iran” or “he backed Arlen Specter against Pat Toomey.”  It is that his poll ratings are so low that supporting Santorum is unrealistic.  This is, in some ways the reverse of Gingrich’s situation a month ago.  A bunch of his supporters didn’t really like him or trust him but they thought he was a sure winner in the general election when he would kill Obama in the debates  The moment Gingrich showed political weakness, they were out the door.  Santorum has a pool of potential supporters that want to know that backing him isn’t a guaranteed waste of time.  A real spark of political life from Santorum and he could make some real gains real fast.  This poll (whatever its validity as a poll) along with a bunch of other smaller pro-Santorum stories over the last several weeks might finally get the Santorum campaign to critical mass.  This feels a lot like the moment when Cain won that straw poll (in Florida I think?) and that started a cycle of positive stories about Cain and his poll numbers zoomed.  A lot of people had already been liking Cain’s debate performances, Perry’s support was disintegrating and suddenly . . . boom! 

I disagree with Santorum on some stuff, (some tax policy,his opposition to homosexuals openly serving in the military, I’m not sure about his foreign policy instincts) but I respect his principles (and that he has some.)  He also seems to try to know what he is talking about.  He is right more often than he is wrong – by a lot.  I’m hoping to enjoy the Santorum boom.

Dear Reader,

Can I be direct with you?

War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.

First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.

But we can’t do it without readers like you.

Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.


Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.

Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.

GIVE NOW

If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Church in the Age of Therapy

Matthew Loftus

In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…

Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot

Anna Farrow

On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…

The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen

Mike Aquilina

Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…