One of Michael Horton’s criticisms of NT Wright has to do with the way he construes the relation of Adam’s sin and Israel’s calling. Wright emphasizes that God’s call to Abraham is the beginning of His response to the sin of Babel, ultimately the sin of Adam. Israel is God’s instruments for redeeming the world. Horton replies, “It is not . . . that the whole world is in Israel, but that even Israel is ‘in Adam.’”
But this criticism misses a major theme of Wright’s work. He emphasizes again and again that the great crisis of the world is precisely this, that Israel ends up being another Adamic people. The reason why the grace of Yahweh is not flowing to the Gentiles is that Israel herself is under a curse; instead of spreading the knowledge of God over the earth,. Israel has caused the Lord’s name to be blasphemed among the nations. In missing this point, Horton misses most of Wright’s argument about the specific place that the cross has in Israel’s history: Jesus comes to bear Israel’s curse and to be the true, faithful Israel, so that the blessing of Abraham can flow out to the Gentiles.
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…