I am still mulling whether to get an H1N1 shot, which is solely in my discretion as it should be.
Not so New York State health care workers. They have been ordered to get the inoculation or lose their jobs—and it is causing a revolt. From the story:
New York is the first state in the country to mandate flu vaccinations for its health care workers. The first doses of swine flu vaccine will be available beginning next week. Much of it is reserved for state health care workers, but there is growing opposition to required innoculations.
Health care workers in Hauppauge screamed “No forced shots!” as they rallied Tuesday against the state regulation requiring them to roll up their sleeves. [Me: Actually allow a swab up their noses.] “I don’t even tend to the sick. I am in the nutrition field. They are telling me I must get the shot because I work in a health clinic setting,” said Paula Small, a Women, Infants and Children health care worker. Small said she will refuse, worried the vaccine is untested and unproven, leaving her vulnerable. In 1976, there were some deaths associated with a swine flu vaccination.
This part of the story seems key to me in judging this issue:
The state said change was needed this year to save lives, typically only about 45 percent of health care workers take advantage of voluntary flu vaccines.
So far, swine flu has not been a particularly deadly disease, although it is dangerous. So, what is it about this flu that requires inoculation, when the regular flu—which kills tens of thousands each year in the USA—is not mandatory. I suspect it is the hysteria surrounding this story—the crucial driver of too much of our public policy these days.
It seems to me that requiring one to be medicated, from which there could be side effects, violates personal autonomy and is only justified by the most serious of health emergencies. I do think that health care workers should have a lower threshold, but in this situation, my sympathies are with the workers.
On a larger note, this story illustrates the power of “health” to become the justification for increased government control.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
