Athanasius opposed to extrinicism in every form. Most obviously, he opposes the Arian effort to make the Son external to the Father and to the being of God. But that intrinsicism unfolds in an intrinsicist, christologically grounded soteriology. Why couldn’t God have sent a creature to save us? he presents the Arians asking. Because, Athanasius says, then “humanity would nevertheless have remained as Adam was before the transgression, receiving grace externally and not having it mingled with the body.” Grace can be made intrinsic only if the Son enters humanity and then joins humanity to God.
Which suggests two consequences: First, that the incarnation was necessary if humanity was going to achieve its final end, even apart from sin; second, that the questions concerning extrinsic/intrinsic grace are perhaps at bottom Christological.
Of Roots and Adventures
I have lived in Ohio, Michigan, Georgia (twice), Pennsylvania, Alabama (also twice), England, and Idaho. I left…
Our Most Popular Articles of 2025
It’s been a big year for First Things. Our website was completely redesigned, and stories like the…
Our Year in Film & Television—2025
First Things editors and writers share the most memorable films and TV shows they watched this year.…