In a couple earlier posts, I’ve commented on the “intrinsicism” in Athanasius. One additional point: Rather than seeing intrinstic/extrinsic as metaphysical opposites, Athanasius’ sees the question in a redemptive-historical, eschatological framework. Extrinsicism is the order of the old, intrinsicism, because of the incarnation, is the order of the new.
That seems to work: Under the old, God was veiled, “incarnate” in a temple; He wrote on objectified tablets of stone. In the new, He comes to look us in the face, incarnate in flesh, and writes on tablets of the human heart with the ink of the Spirit.
What happens to the order of sacraments in that case? One might rush on to pietist inwardism. That would be a mistake: The Son comes in the flesh ; intrinsicism is not an evacuation of flesh, but a transformation of flesh from the inside. Augustine was right. The new sacraments are fewer and simpler, also more efficacious.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…
How the State Failed Noelia Castillo
On March 26, Noelia Castillo, a twenty-five-year-old Spanish woman, was killed by her doctors at her own…
The Mind’s Profane and Sacred Loves
The teachers you have make all the difference in your life. That they happened to come into…
