Important Changes Coming to Liverpool Care Pathway

I joined many others in pounding the apparent abuse of the UK’s Liverpool Care Pathway, both in articles here—and during my recent debate/speech tour of Scotland/London.  Readers may recall that the Pathway puts people near death into an artificial coma.  I do not object to “palliative sedation” properly applied—which is not dehydrating people to death as seems to have happened in some cases. But I worried that with a whopping 16.5% sedation rate, dying people were being treated as a member of a category rather than as individuals, meaning that some were being sedated even when not warranted by their symptoms.

Well, now some important changes are apparently going to be made.  From the story :

The architects of the LCP are seeking to address these concerns with a revised version of the guidelines which they will launch on Wednesday. They will include the requirement that patients and their families are consulted before the LCP is commenced, and will stipulate that food, fluids and non-palliative medication should be withdrawn only if they are harmful or burdensome to a dying patient.

“The most important thing is communication,” says Debbie Murphy, co-author and lead nurse of the LCP. “We are looking at articulating more clearly the absolute need to make these clinical decisions in the best interests of the patient, and to support them with a conversation with families so that we don’t get a situation where a relative or carer doesn’t understand that their loved one is actually expected to die now. We do not advise a blanket approach and we are not saying that food and fluids should stop. We are just saying that doctors need to stop and think and consider what’s best.”

Much better.  Good for the medical authorities in the UK fpr responding to properly addressed concerns.  Still, the treatment of these patients should be closely monitored by administrators and patient care activists to ensure that each person considered for the Pathway actually requires that level of palliative intervention.

Dear Reader,

Can I be direct with you?

War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.

First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.

But we can’t do it without readers like you.

Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.


Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.

Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.

GIVE NOW

If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Church in the Age of Therapy

Matthew Loftus

In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…

Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot

Anna Farrow

On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…

The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen

Mike Aquilina

Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…