Baudrillard sounds like a nut when he says that we are now living in a hyperreal world, a virtual world. But there is certainly something to it. We’re still physical creatures, of course, surrounded by physical objects, and that doesn’t change when we get strapped in for some virtual experience. But when we glance in other directions, say at social relations, hyperreality becomes more plausible. Don’t we know people who, through various media, know more about celebrities than they know about their spouses? Aren’t there people whose closest – that is, warmest, most intimate – personal connections are to characters in TV and film than to living neighbors? Don’t “social” events, which once involved mainly conversation, games, eating together, today often become common participation in entertainment – games, a DVD, a movie? And isn’t all that a little bit like living in hyperreality?
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…