Ahmed Marabet, a Muslim police officer killed in the attack on Charlie Hebdo, was caught in the crossfire of two different failures in communication. On the one end was Charlie Hebdo, which had abused free speech for blasphemy and racist mockery. On the other end were the gunmen who, instead of responding with more free speech, chose violence and murder.
As many Muslims know, Ahmed is a form of the name Muhammad, the prophet who those gunmen falsely claimed to honor and defend. When those who heard of his death began to cry “Je suis Ahmed,” the name of the Prophet was poignantly elevated from the muck into which the killers had dragged it.
I tasked myself, torturously, to look at some of these offensive images of Prophet Muhammad. I did not recognize him. Charlie Hebdo failed to capture the man beloved to a billion of the world’s population—beloved to me.
Many think religious believers simply shouldn’t care when confronted with blasphemy. But a lackadaisical indifference to life is no more civilized than excessive or misplaced sensitivity. In the wake of this tragedy it has become clear that free speech is sacred to many—beyond reproach. For Muslims, the personhood of the Prophet Muhammad and all prophets of God are sacred, so how might we negotiate the sanctity of free speech and that of our religious figures?
There is a story from the Prophet’s life in which the tribe called the Quraysh sought to defame him by calling him “Mudhammam” which means roughly “shameful” or “reprobate.” This has roughly the opposite meaning of his real name, which means “laudable.”
The Prophet’s companions’ were perturbed at hearing this, but the Prophet modeled calm: “Is it not wondrous how God turns away from me the injuries of Quraysh? They revile Mudhammam, whereas I am Muhammad.” He refused to accept the terms of his scoffers.
Muslims responding to mockery today should do the same. We must not give scoffers the pleasure of defining ourselves in reaction to their taunts. The fact is that the overwhelming majority of Muslims, though offended by such images, already ignore them. They refuse to recognize caricatures invented in the mind of people who do not know and could not recognize those they mock. In doing so, they follow the directive of their prophet.
Faatimah Knight is pursuing an MA in Religious Studies at the Chicago Theological Seminary and holds a BA in Islamic Law and Theology from Zaytuna College.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…