Gerard O’Collins points out that Arian and modern neo-Arian Christologies have significant implications for our understanding of the extent of God’s favor toward us. According to traditional Christologies, “God so valued us and our historical, space-time world that the Son of God entered it in person. By assuming a human existence, the second person of the Trinity showed what we mean and meant to God.” On the other hand, Arian Christologies give us “a Jesus who is not truly divine, means that God was really unwilling to become human and did not after al set such a value on us. Some else (who was not divine) was sent to do the job of mediating to us final revelation and salvation.”
Moral Certitude and the Iran War
The current military engagement with Iran calls renewed attention to just war theory in the Catholic tradition.…
The Slow Death of England: New and Notable Books
The fate of England is much in the news as popular resistance to mass immigration grows, limits…
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…