Honor games are competitive, but the competition is always qualified by the mutual need of honor-seekers. Achilles wants to be the hero of the battle, and that means that Diomedes cannot be. But Achilles’s honor exists only in the respectful regard of other heroes like Diomedes. Honor-seekers can’t consistently wish for the destruction of all rivals, for the destruction of all rivals is also the destruction of honor. Ancient heroes play for keeps, but they are always conscious that even the most bitter enemies are members of the same club.
Enter the woman, and the dynamics change completely. Now the only regard that matters is the regard of the lady, and while it might add to the victor’s delight for the rival to envy the victor’s victory, it’s not essential to the victory. It doesn’t matter whether the rival survives or not. The only thing needful is the love of the lady. Honor is not exactly a zero-sum game; romance is. It’s a winner-take-all game, because there is only one lady.
Chivalry, where the hero battles for the love, is more, not less violent, than ancient honor, where the hero battles for glory.
Rebel Against the Cult of the Expert
For me, the end of the academic year is always bittersweet. The sweetness comes from seeing students…
Lift My Chin, Lord
Lift my chin, Lord,Say to me,“You are not whoYou feared to be,Not Hecate, quite,With howling sound,Torch held…
Letters
Two delightful essays in the March issue, by Nikolas Prassas (“Large Language Poetry,” March 2025) and Gary…