Reflecting on Colossians 1:19-20, NT Wright notes that the incarnation and cross were not “undertaken with reluctance or merely because there was no other course. God not only acted in this way: he ‘took pleasure’ in doing so.”
Much popular atonement theology suggests otherwise: The conflict between God’s mercy and justice puts Him in a tight spot, which He resolves by sending His Son to receive the penalty for us. Jesus is God-as-substitute for sinners, but our formulations often suggest that God was forced into the atonement.
As Barth liked to emphasize, God remains Lord even in His revelation, the incarnation. Even – especially – here, He acts according to His good pleasure.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Notes on Anosmia
One morning several years ago, as my wife, Wendy, and I were having breakfast together, I had…
Empire of Unreality
Shiva Naipaul (1945–1985) was the author of three novels and two books of mordant dispatches from places…
The Dreadful Christ of Pär Lagerkvist
It’s dangerous to meet a god,” says the disgraced Pythia in Pär Lagerkvist’s The Sibyl. Her observation…
