Sage cautions from de Lubac: In speaking of the generous giving of God, “one must, a fortiori , be careful to correct – if not wholly to avoid – the neo-Platonist metaphors of flux, of gushing, of ‘effluence,’ of emanation, of soaking into things. God is not, as one might think from some Platonist expressions also taken up by Denys, a generosity pouring himself out; it is at best inadequate to see him simply as that ‘fundamental generosity’ which must mean, for the Absolute, simply the fact of being essentially communicable; or that kind of generosity which is no more than a de-sacralized charity . . . . I would not, for instance, be too eager to speak of God as a wave flowing over us, or as a light glowing. No would I say with Simone Weil that ‘God loves . . . as an emerald is green.”
On the contrary, Christians must say that God’s goodness is “a ‘willed goodness,’ a goodness which is also benignity. God is love in person, love which freely, and not because of any law or inner determination, creates the being to whom he wills to give himself, and gives himself freely.” Images of overflow imply, de Lubac recognizes, that there is some possibility or impossibility, some potentiality that is more fundamental, deeper, or higher than God’s will. De Lubac quotes Anselm: “sola in eo operatur voluntas. Voluntatem Eius null praecessit necessitas.”
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…
How the State Failed Noelia Castillo
On March 26, Noelia Castillo, a twenty-five-year-old Spanish woman, was killed by her doctors at her own…
The Mind’s Profane and Sacred Loves
The teachers you have make all the difference in your life. That they happened to come into…